Correlations between Scales for Female Participants in Study 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Virtue

Moral

Sexual

Agency

Comp

Power

AWS

HSS

N&M

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chivalry

0.49**

 

0.54**

0.34**

0.45**

0.32**

0.53**

0.63**

0.45**

0.88**

Virtue

 

 

0.91**

0.90**

0.57**

0.49**

0.57**

0.42**

0.39**

0.47**

  Moral

 

 

 

0.65**

0.54**

0.46**

0.55**

0.40**

0.30**

0.54**

  Sexual

 

 

 

 

0.50**

0.44**

0.50**

0.35**

0.40**

0.31**

Agency

 

 

 

 

 

0.94**

0.93**

0.73**

0.68**

0.43**

  Comp.

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.74**

0.54**

0.58**

0.32**

  Power

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.81**

0.68**

0.48**

AWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.70**

0.61**

HSS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.44**

Note.  N for each correlation was 138 except for correlations including the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS), the Hostile Sexism Scale (HSS), and Nadler & Morrow’s Chivalry Scale (N&M), in which case N = 80.  ** p < .01.

 

Correlations between Scales for Male Participants in Study 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Virtue

Moral

Sexual

Agency

Comp

Power

AWS

HSS

N&M

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chivalry

 

0.34**

a

0.41**

a

0.20**

0.21**

a

0.10

a

0.31**

a

0.37**

a

0.09

a

0.87**

Virtue

 

 

0.88**

a

0.89**

0.51**

0.42**

0.52**

0.50**

0.26**

0.33**

  Moral

 

 

 

0.57**

0.45**

0.35**

0.49**

0.50**

0.24

0.43**

  Sexual

 

 

 

 

0.45**

0.40**

0.44**

0.41**

0.24**

0.18

Agency

 

 

 

 

 

0.93**

0.90**

a

0.78**

0.53**

a

0.19

a

  Comp.

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.68**

0.67**

0.43**

0.10

  Power

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.82**

0.57**

0.28**

AWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.51**

a

0.36**

a

HSS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.01

a

Note.  N for each correlation was 270 except for correlations including the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS), the Hostile Sexism Scale (HSS), and Nadler & Morrow’s Chivalry Scale (N&M), in which case N = 118.  a The correlations for male participants differed significantly (p < .01) from the correlations for female participants.  **p < .01.