CEP 900: Proseminar in Educational Psychology
Fall 2001
| David Wong, Ph.D. | Ellen Altermatt, Ph.D. |
| 350 Erickson Hall | 451 Erickson Hall |
| 353-9285 | 353-5047 |
| dwong@msu.edu | ealterma@msu.edu |
Course Web Page: http://www.msu.edu/~dwong/CEP900/
Course
Description
This
proseminar is designed especially for first year doctoral students in CEPSE to
introduce them to some major ideas, questions, and issues in the field and how
researchers have addressed them. The
Proseminar is a course that evolves over time, being shaped by the faculty and
students who participate in it each year. We
currently think of the Proseminar as a place where we will:
•
Introduce the major theoretical perspectives on learning and development.
These perspectives include the behavioral, cognitive, and socio-cultural
perspectives.
•
Examine current issues and debates in educational practice.
We will encourage you to see issues from multiple perspectives and to
combine ideas from class and your own personal experiences in developing a more
sophisticated understanding of these issues.
•
Encourage you to develop your individual areas of interest by delving
into its literature and talking with scholars in the field.
•
Create a community of learners and scholars among the Proseminar students
and department faculty.
•
Facilitate your participation in the larger community of educational
researchers and scholars.
•
Develop your writing, speaking, listening, and inquiry skills and
dispositions within a professional context.
The
proseminar brings together students from different areas in educational
psychology including Educational Psychology, Measurement and Quantitative
Methods, School Psychology, Special Education, and School Counseling to examine
the common field of learning and development.
This diversity among students represents a microcosm of our department
and we envision the proseminar as a site for learning how to enter into
conversation with people representing these different fields, interests, and
perspectives.
During
the Fall semester, we will examine learning and development from a variety of
perspectives. In particular we will focus on the nature of scholarship and
disciplined inquiry concerning learning and development: What kinds of questions
do psychologists and educators ask? What
methods do they use? How does
knowledge grow and change within disciplinary communities?
Issues to be considered include conceptions of what it means to know and
learn in school and other settings, and methods that educational psychologists
and others have used to study learning and development.
Many
of the class sessions will focus on issues that have been important in the
discourse of educational psychologists about learning and development, issues
such as the role of culture and community in knowledge and learning, the
situated nature of learning, and the role of disciplinary knowledge in
development and learning. The readings about these issues will be taken from a variety
of theoretical perspectives to help students begin to map out for themselves the
"territory" of educational psychology--the theories and discourse
communities that make up the field.
We hope the Proseminar will play an important role in introducing you to advanced graduate study of learning and development, and the diverse settings in which learning and development takes place. Although the course is not a comprehensive survey of educational psychology, we will discuss key ideas, methods, and perspectives of educational psychology and related fields as we examine a variety of research studies, and read current articles in the field.
![]()
Major
Assignments
As
an emerging scholar, one of your main activities will be participating in
ongoing national and international discourse in your field.
The goal of this project is to help you take the first steps at becoming
a legitimate participant. In order
to do this, you must first understand the nature of the discourse that you are
joining. Every discourse community
is a complex social network of individuals, ideas, and research. In addition, the discourse has a history - it came from
somewhere, has been through changes, and has been influenced by certain people,
ideas, and events. In order to
participate appropriately and to be accepted and respected by others, it is
critical that you appreciate these qualities of your field.
This
project involves many different tasks.
Task
1. Talk
to people in your field. Get a
broad overview of the issues, people, and ideas.
You should plan on having several meetings with your faculty advisor,
make appointments to talk with other faculty, and meet with several advanced
graduate students. Make notes from
all meetings.
Task
2. Review
the past 5 years of 3 major journals. Skim
the articles to figure out the major topics, ideas, and issues.
Keep notes.
Task
3. Become
familiar with the history and current state of your field.
Read review, overview, and historical pieces in handbooks, journals, or
textbooks. Keep notes.
Electronic
portfolio.
All students will create an electronic portfolio by the end of the
semester. The purpose of
these portfolios is to be a useful resource for doctoral students and faculty
interested in your particular field. Each
portfolio should include the following components:
1. An historical visual representation of your field. Illustrate how the field has changed during the last 30 years
2.
A present-day visual representation of your field.
Illustrate the current state of the field: i.e., important people, ideas,
etc.
3.
Variation within the field. Contemporary
and historical differences in how people have thought about the issues
4.
Notes from meetings with people in your field (see Task 1)
5.
Notes from journal review (see Task 2)
6.
Annotated lists:
20 influential
written works
10 influential
people
6 important ideas
6 important
studies or research programs
6 major journals
4 research
methodologies
4 contextual
influences (historical events, technological innovations, etc.)
4 important
conferences
Popular handbooks
Useful resources
(library, website, books, etc.)
Due
dates
Draft
1:
Sep 17
Draft
2:
Oct 29
Presentation:
Dec 9
You
will be introduced to many new ideas in proseminar.
As John Dewey would have it, our goal is not simply for you to comprehend
these ideas, but for you to see, act, think, and feel differently about the
world because of these ideas. Understanding
is more than a mental, intellectual act; it is an act of living.
Thus, to fully understand an idea is to understand what it means to live
with that idea. Similarly, to
learn an idea is to live with it for awhile.
Therefore, not only will we ask you to read and discuss ideas in class,
you will also be asked to try out these ideas in the world beyond proseminar.
Two
times during the semester, you will make a concerted effort to learn ideas by
living ideas. Each assignment
involves the following two parts:
Living:
to learn about an idea is to live with it
-select an idea
from class, find others who want to live the same idea
-put yourself in
situations where you might live (observe, think, feel, act, etc.) with the idea
-observe, think,
feel, and act with the idea for several days
-keep a journal
record of your experience during this time
-meet with others
in your group to discuss the similarities and differences in your experience
Writing:
to write is to reflect upon and verbalize the experience of living with an idea.
Your write-up should be up to 5 double-spaced pages and should include:
-a synopsis of
the idea
-its initial
meaning to you
-a description of
the idea in action
-a comparison and
contrast between your and others' experience with the idea
-an analysis of
how the meaning of the idea has evolved for you
Due dates
Assignment 1:
Oct 1
Assignment 2:
Nov 12
Article Critique
As a doctoral student, you will be entering into a community of academic scholars. A central requirement for participating in the community and for successfully completing your doctoral studies is to be able to learn from the work that others have done. You will learn how to read an article with a mind that is open, yet critical. You will be required to prepare an extensive critique of a specified research article. This kind of activity will begin to prepare you for the Preliminary Examination which all doctoral students take at the beginning of their second year.
Due
dates
Critique
1: Oct 15
Critique
2: Nov 26
A vital part of becoming a
scholar is learning to write well. Good
scholarly writing is clear and compelling.
In addition, writing in your field has particular conventions that are
essential to understand if you are to become an effective writer.
We will have several short writing assignments during the semester
designed to help you become more adept with the communication conventions of
scholarship.
Because our class relies
heavily on discussion, participation is essential. We hope that you can attend every class.
We realize, though, that on occasion it will be difficult to get to
class. If this happens, it is your
responsibility to let us know ahead of time of your absence, to complete the
week’s assignment, and to get class notes.
In the past, students have found it useful to leave a tape recorder in
class in their absence. If you miss more than 3 classes, we will have to lower your
grade in proportion to the number of absences in fairness to others.
We recommend that you meet with us early on if you anticipate problems
with your attendance.
Evaluation
Your
semester grade is based on four components weighted as follows:
Research
Interest Portfolio 50%
Class
Participation/Attendance 20%
Assignment
Preparation* 30%
Evaluated, non-graded work
-
Living and Learning Ideas
-
Article critiques
-
Scholarly writing “exercises”
* It is sometimes difficult to
assign grades based on quality because students are just beginning or in the
midst of learning how do the work. What
can be graded, however, is the degree that the student seems to have prepared
for or put genuine effort into the assignment. Therefore, some assignments will be grade on this
basis. These assignments include
the assigned readings, the living and learning ideas project, the article
critiques, and the scholarly writing exercises.
In addition to semester grades, a written evaluation of students’ work will be prepared. At the end of the semester, these instructor comments will be passed on to students and to their advisors and placed into the students’ academic files.
![]()
Reading Materials
Texts
Abbeduto,
L. (1999). Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in
Educational Psychology. Guilford,
CT: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. ISBN: 0072350768
Miller, P. H. (1993).
Theories of Developmental Psychology, 3rd ed.
W. H. Freeman & Co. ISBN: 0716723093
Phillips, D. C., & Soltis, J. F.
(1998). Perspectives on Learning, 3rd ed. (Thinking About
Education Series). New York:
Teachers College Press. ISBN:
0807737038
Reader
Altermatt,
E. R., Pomerantz, E. M., Ruble, D. N., Frey, K. S., & Greulich, F. K.
(2001). Evaluative discourse in the classroom:
A naturalistic examination of the processes of peer socialization.
Manuscript under review.
Brophy,
J. Motivating students to learn. NY: McGraw Hill. Chap 2.
Durkin,
K. (1995).Chapter 9: Social cognition I: Understanding the social world.
n K. Durkin, Developmental Social
Psychology: From Infancy to Old Age (pp. 290-301, 317-323).
Heath,
S. B. (1982). Questioning at home and at school: A comparative study. In G.
Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling: Anthropology in action.
NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Paris,
S. G., & Cunningham, A. E. (1996). Children becoming students. In D. C.
Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.). Handbook of Educational Psychology
(pp. 117-147). New York: MacMillan.
Phillips,
D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism.
Educational Researcher, 24 (7), 5-12.
Skinner,
B. F. (1954). The science of
learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24,
86-97.
![]()
Schedule
of Topics and Assignments
|
|
Topic |
Readings |
|
Aug 27 |
Introduction
& Overview |
|
|
Sep
3 |
Labor
Day |
no
class |
|
Sep 10 |
Behaviorism |
Philips,
D. C., & Soltis, J. F. (1998). Perspectives on Learning.
Behaviorism. Abbeduto,
L. (1999). Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in
Educational Psychology. ISSUE
7. Do Rewards Facilitate Learning? YES:
Paul Chance, from "The Rewards of Learning," Phi Delta Kappan NO:
Alfie Kohn, from "Rewards Versus Learning: A Response to Paul
Chance," Phi Delta Kappan |
|
Sep 17 |
Behaviorism |
Miller,
P. Theories of Developmental Psychology, Chap. 3, “Social
learning theory.” Skinner,
B. F. (1954). The science of
learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24,
86-97. Due Draft
1: Research Interests |
|
Sep 24 |
Cognitive
Perspectives |
Perspectives on
Learning, Chap. 5, "Piagetian structures and psychological
constructivism" Theories
of Developmental Psychology, Chap.
1, “Piaget’s Cognitive-Stage theory.” Taking
Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in Educational Psychology. ISSUE
8. Should Schools Adopt a Child-Centered Approach to Education? YES:
Mark Windschitl, from "The Challenges of Sustaining a Constructivist
Classroom Culture," Phi Delta Kappan NO:
E. D. Hirsch, Jr., from "Reality's Revenge: Research and
Ideology," American Educator |
|
Oct 1 |
Cognitive
Perspectives |
Miller, P. Theories of
Developmental Psychology, Chap. 4, “Information-processing
theory.” Phillips,
D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of
constructivism. Educational
Researcher, 24 (7), 5-12. Due Learning
Ideas, Assignment 1 |
|
Oct 8 |
Socio-cultural
Perspectives |
Perspectives on
Learning, Chap. 6, "Social Aspects of learning" Theories
of Developmental Psychology, Chap.
7, “Vygotsky’s theory and the contextualists.” |
|
Oct 15 |
Socio-cultural
Perspectives |
Taking Sides: Clashing
Views on Controversial Issues in Educational Psychology. ISSUE
6. Should Moral Education Be Part of the School Curriculum? YES:
Thomas Lickona, from "The Return of Character Education,"
Educational Leadership NO:
Alfie Kohn, from "How Not to Teach Values: A Critical Look at
Character Education," Phi Delta Kappan Due Article
Critique 1 |
|
Oct 22 |
Motivation:
Developmental Perspectives |
Paris, S. G. &
Cunningham, A. E. (1996). Children
Becoming Students. ISSUE 2. Should
Ability-Level Tracking Be Abandoned? YES:
Jeanie Oakes and Amy Stuart Wells, from “Detracking for High Student
Achievement,” Educational Leadership NO:
Sally M. Reis et al., from “Equal Does Not Mean Identical,”
Educational Leadership |
|
Oct 29 |
Motivation
: Socialization Within the Classroom |
Brophy, J. Motivating
students to learn. NY: McGraw Hill. Chap 2. Taking Sides: Clashing
Views on Controversial Issues in Educational Psychology. ISSUE
10. Will a Push for Standards and Accountability Lead to More Motivated
Students? YES:
Lauren B. Resnick, from "From Aptitude to Effort: A New Foundation
for Our Schools," American Educator NO:
Kennon M. Sheldon and Bruce J. Biddle, from "Standards,
Accountability, and School Reform: Perils and Pitfalls," Teachers
College Record Due Draft 2: Research
Interests |
|
Nov 5 |
Development
of Identity and Self |
Durkin, K. (1995).
Chapter 9. Social Cognition I: Understanding the Social World. Altermatt, E. R., et al.
(2001). Evaluative discourse
in the classroom: A naturalistic examination of the processes of peer
socialization. |
|
Nov |
Individual
Differences and Diversity |
Heath,
S. B. (1982). Questioning at home and at school: A comparative study. In
G. Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling: Anthropology in
action. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Taking
Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in Educational Psychology. ISSUE
4. Is Full Inclusion Always the Best Option for Children With
Disabilities? YES:
Mara Sapon-Shevin, from "Full Inclusion as Disclosing Tablet:
Revealing the Flaws in Our Present System," Theory into Practice NO:
Naomi Zigmond and Janice M. Baker, from "Full Inclusion for Students
With Learning Disabilities: Too Much of a Good Thing?" Theory into
Practice Due Learning
Ideas, Assignment 2 |
| Nov 19 | An
Alternative Perspective on Learning and Motivation
|
Wong, D. The opposite of control: A neo-Deweyan perspective on motivation and learning. |
|
Nov 26 |
To
Be Announced |
Due Article
Critique 2 |
|
Dec 2 |
Last
week of class |
Research
Interests Presentations |
|
Dec 9 |
Exam
week |
Research
Interests Presentations |